The previous one is just kidding. Everyone please don't take it serious.
And this one is serious.
Perhaps it is universally acknowledged that all things should be "real" in the entire Olympic games. And I can't even imagine how the two little girls would feel...you know, the implicit meaning of this fake is that the little girl's appearance is reckoned as an opposition to the interest of the country because hiding her face to public is due to the consideration of the country's interest.
Don't you think that it is too serious? And why don't they pay the same attention to the psychological effect on the two girls? One is blamed to have an ugly face and the other an unpleasant voice. You don't want your daughter in either position, right?
What I know as a worldwide standard is that children should be protected and they deserve the greatest respect.
That's what I believe, sincerely.
With all due respect !!
ReplyDeleteHave you ever done any research regarding the patriotism in China ??
Be very honest, it is like "The Pledge of Allegiance" in the U.S., all little kids sing (they know nothing about it) with it when they're in Pre-K !! It means it'll be privileged to have something done to his/her own country, that's the similar patriotic spirit for both China and the U.S. I haven't seen anything wrong with it and/or any misallied psychological effect for the "So-called" ugly girl.
Actually, the so-called ugly girl may think good of herself for doing something honorable to her own country !!
Some of Hong Kong dudes like to force own "ABSOLUTE RIGHT"'s doctrine to others, that's what I hate :) !! BTW, those HK people will never admit, they are kicking the wrong butt.
If you're wanna blame someone, they should consider the Event PR spokesman who spoke to the AP, Reuters...etc !! He knew "DICKS" about doing a PR job in front of the media.
Being able to do something good to your country, no matter it's big or small, it is something called "HONOR" !! That's their own way of mind education.
For what I've seen was someone using it to attack China without any appropriate excuse or acting as onging conspiracy : 1st) Wow, a BIG liar (the whole broadcast is a SHOW anyway), 2nd) Fxxk up little girl's mind, 3rd) blah blah blah...
Later, I predict those rats will say something like "China got no human rights, Reversing 89's event, China produced fake stuffs, blah blah...etc"
Again, people shouldn't use their own standard to measure something that's different from their own value OR they know nothing about !!
(I'm not talking about getting info from the TV set only, I'm saying of going into the deepest level of the society to see for yourself.)
Thanks :)
ps: who in this world can tell how the so-called ugly girl was mistreated/not respected/not protected ?
She might be very happy, and getting the utmost respect from her classmates/teachers/countrymen.
sorry, bro,
ReplyDeleteI have a little bit more inputs :
I'll say it's naive to try using some minor/small things for achieving a bigger political goal(s) or shaking a reputation of a regime.
(I have seen many people doing those !!)
A birth of a regime is not by mouths/papers/writings/demonstrations/... It consists of bloodshed, wars, weapons, tears...etc !!
I don't know why the heck people doing that kind of stuffs against the regime done nothing to them. Hmmm interesting ah ha ??
俾人話個樣生得有辱國體
ReplyDelete仲要覺得bonour
呢樣野最恐怖
同埋, 林妙可小朋友
在穿崩之前
對記者講呢單野, 仲講到好似係自己唱
小小年紀講大話面無懼色
可以想像佢身遭環境之卑劣
It consists of bloodshed, wars, weapons, tears...etc
ReplyDelete>>>
YES...
血和淚, 實在太多了
三反五反, 槍斃的超過一百萬
土改, 又一百萬
大躍進就多d, 3000萬
文革, 冇人知, (因為e+既領導人有份打呃殺),二百萬冇走雞
仲未計王震殺入新彊...
而呢個國家到e+都唔面對歷史wor
建國後唔計, 建國前果d都篡改埋
都幾值得honur ka
歷史上真係冇咩國家有o甘輝煌既歷史
而最重要, 呢d係唔關今次作假事件
ReplyDelete今次事件, 純粹係:有冇欺騙 !!!!
仲有, 有批評意見既就係rats ?
美國至少有一億rats了
arm既, 做人唔好有standard,
唔好有原則
最緊要睇阿爺話乜就乜lor
官大為準丫ma
(為國家honour, 又唔係另一個standard?)
不過呢次, 連官方發言人都唔敢回應wor
最開心既係華文報紙一齊自律
所有異見者, 都係rats....
profligate:
ReplyDeleteThanks for saying "with all due respect" as a beginning without "f off" as a conclusion.
Just kidding.
Well, certainly she doesn't understand what happen, or she knows but just get rid of it very soon. And everybody here will forget this event soon after the game, too.
But these doesn't provide reasons to validate the substitution. And just please don't compare everything to the America. We don't follow the America. And the American standard is not always showing a universal interest. I really hate people measuring anything by the U.S, British or any other foreign culture. They are not representing the universe. OK?
Perhaps I am still kicking a wrong butt, but you know, everyone in the world thinks his/her doctrine is absolutely right. And by this standard, everyone is kicking the wrong butt. So I just talk about my own doctrine. I apologize if you get frustrated.
Back to the subject. There is no question that the girl feels honorable to perform in the opening...behind the opening, to be more accurate. But she will know what really happen, and what it really means to her that she can just sing behind someone else. You think that she is getting utmost respect from her friends and parents. That's true. But she can never get respect from herself. Because the most cherishing thing to a woman will always be the appearance but not the voice. Never try to blame, or make her feel that you are trying to blame a girl's appearance. That's what I have learnt from my life.
Of course she doesn't care now. She even doesn't know how to mark up herself. But just think about it: How about when she grows up? when she knows how to mark up? When she knows that boys will never fall in love with a girl just because of her charming voice? Doesn't it mean too much for a little girl?
And how about the one standing on the table and being dictated to pretend singing in front of billions of people in the world? Again, she doesn't know what it means. But anyone knows that she will in the future. Doesn't it mean too much for her, too?
Everyone in the country now just put the burden of "interest of the country" to these two little girls as if the Philippines get the "profit of the country" from the maiden in your home. You think it is portraying the rise of the nation but I think it is demeaning the Chinese culture.
And also a core value of mankind.
I guess from your words that you have the intention to extend the topic to the protest for freedom and democracy in HongKong. I shall talk it later.
After all, I have to say sorry if my tongue was showing offensive.
BTW, my fd, can you read Chinese?
Derek 兄,
ReplyDelete謝謝你的意見, 你亦導出另一角度的觀點。
回"篤篤篤撐":
>血和淚, 實在太多了
>三反五反, 槍斃的超過一百萬
>土改, 又一百萬
>大躍進就多d, 3000萬
>文革, 冇人知, (因為e+既領導人有份打呃>>殺),二百萬冇走雞
>仲未計王震殺入新彊...
>而呢個國家到e+都唔面對歷史wor
>建國後唔計, 建國前果d都篡改埋
你所說的是毛伯時代的, 毛為鞏固自己政權的手段, 現在的胡溫領導層, 實是當時的受害人, 其中有 "上山下鄉", "土改", 被打成 "資本派" (溫是趙紫楊派系), ...等等。
文革根本就是打擊政治對手的手段, 新派的鄧小平亦曾睡過牛欄也是事實, 你還認為現在的中共會走回頭路嗎 ?
新派的全都知怎樣走才是對國家、國民有益, 因很多都是受現代教育的, 但派系的千絲萬縷關係仍存在, 有時當權者都是無能為力的。
之前的"毛" 問題, 那有要後來出枱的承擔呢 !
今天中國的共黨是否已比你所說的當年好很多了 ?
還有是胡與溫都是文官出身, 所以無做過你所說的兩百萬吧 ! 否則他們亦不需被軍中老派系及江 (他無中生有地製造多一倍的親自己司令員, 覆蓋整個軍區版圖。) 系派架空實軍權, 要在其中空間生存。
我不是不喜歡為中國謀好的, 但應在最合適的時候做最適合的東西, 不是盲目的為反對而反對; 現在溫飽也是問題, 普遍教育程度低; 若共黨突然沒了, 國內的百姓只會墮進更水深火熱而已。或被一些現有特權的心人利用, 他們將比現在更慘。
抱歉, 還有將會為下一任國家主席的【習近平】, 他老爸亦受過逼害的。
ReplyDelete習亦算是新思維的新派系。
謝謝
之前的"毛" 問題, 那有要後來出枱的承擔呢 !
ReplyDelete>>>KAKAKA
佢地連毛有問題都唔承認ar
仲話一貫共產黨領導
同埋, 上出下鄉係文革後期既做法
在上山下鄉前、文革高潮時,
這些革命小闖將又做過d乜呢 ?
趙紫陽朱鎔基佢地文革時有乜遭遇清清楚楚, 呢一代呢 ?
歷史在這裡空白。
仲有,唔好只係講文革
三反五反土改都係由鄧小平負責
有冇人講過呢 ?
係冇ka
老毛一個人可以運動八億堯舜前後達28年 ?
成個官僚上下幾十萬, 人人清白 ?
wakakaka....
都係中華人民共和國嘛,
唔通30年前果個唔係中華人民共和國 ?
對我而言, 中華人民共和國係由1949開始計,
呢個國家既光榮同恥辱,
是否應一併計算,
而不應選擇性失憶呢呢 ?
仲有, 我地講緊呢個國家有乜野honour
唔係講國家會唔會走回頭路
係2個concept
舉例說, 某人發財立品, 仲攞埋荷蘭水蓋
但有人話佢以前殺過人
o甘你冇理由話人地o甘講唔arm,
因為有錢佬好少會走回頭路又殺人
(雖然有錢佬好少會再殺人)
再講一次,
呢次係做假
唔關國家/民主事,
同埋, 講國家尊嚴/榮譽
唔應該選擇擇性憶
同埋, 對國家歷史提出異見
ReplyDelete都冇人話要推翻共產黨
如果係o甘,
美國人話反思對indian既罪行
美國80年代重寫教科書一改以往白人基督教文化既觀念
澳洲人向原住民道歉
加拿大向華人賠償......
我諗, 克林頓/老bush/ regan都應該係想結束美利堅共和國了, 霍華德之流更加唔洗講
異見者= 推翻祖國
o甘既思考方法,真係走回頭路了
咪係我度開拖先得架...
ReplyDeleteDerek 兄,
ReplyDelete不好意思借用這裡來談話。
篤先生,
你一定估計由鄧小平開始的領導人都是啞巴了, 是嗎 ??
若你講了, 就算你是黨主席, 亦會有潛在危險的。 我不想再從頭說完又要再說 !! 軍權是很多派的, 若你 "公開" 說了一些令毛系或其他系 (現在仍有很多系) 有害的言論, 普通官會人間蒸發, 那譬如你是當權領導人 (只有政或黨權)。 你會為他人無端端得罪一批軍人嗎 ? 做這事你可能還會連累旁人及家人。
內戰, 就不是走回頭路了, 是嗎 ??
為了向全世界證實中國是開明及跟得上西方國家的做法, 亦可不惜一切, 包括內戰、犧牲大部份百姓生命、...等等 !! 你說得容易, 你有沒有看過有軍權者是多麼的霸道 ?? 現在是軍、政、黨, 再不是毛時的黨、政、軍了。
我之前是建議國民先食飽及有好教育; 讓他們了解中國的過去, 再讓他們自己做主。 那樣不好嗎 ?? 是否應該現在向全世界公告毛及七八十年代領導人的不是, 讓他們自己的嫡系自己打餐飽解決 ?? 或為反對而反對, 就如外國般呢 ??
謝謝 Derek 兄借出地方及 Profligate is out !! 因說持不同意見者, 自己亦不先深入了解當中的。 所以後會有期啦 !!
ps : 在外國民主制度下, 領導落枱後, 再無很多特權 !! 在中國, 實權仍緊握在一小批前領導人手上的; 請不明中國國情者先作研究。
講下opening有冇欺騙成份
ReplyDelete變成要中國走回頭路= 內戰=不惜一切 ?
真係唔明點解有o甘既推論
共黨內有好多派別
同之前講既有乜關係呢 ?
唔明
先食飽及有好教育; 讓他們了解中國的過去
>>>>>
了解篡改左歷史既過去 ?
中國既過去由邊個寫sin ?
幾十萬黨員幫手殺左幾千萬人
呢個過去,比唔比大家認識好呢 ?
(當然, 為左國家既honour,最好只比中國人民認識佢地在文革係受害者,但不要讓人知佢地曾參與既謀殺)
同理, 我地應該冇ground鬧日本仔,
紐倫堡大審亦唔應審nazi戰犯
(因為佢地唔可以開罪德國既hitler娑別/軍中不同勢力/SS.....)
結論: 中國人係冇資格批評仕何犯有集體罪行/篡尹歷史既人
因為如你所言,
中國人在面對犯罪時,有好多理由開解的
SO DOES 其它國家
(所以, 好明白90年代北京支持波斯尼亞中滅族的塞爾維亞人、E+又支持蘇丹既達爾富爾POLICY)
得, 我明白, 好多人做野係逼於無奈
o甘, 同欺騙有乜關係
最後,真係要問
點解批評OPENING就係要中國走回頭路 ?
PS
DEREK, 因為手痕, 用左你呢度講閒話TIM
SORRY....
實權仍緊握在一小批前領導人手上的; 請不明中國國情者先作研究。
ReplyDelete>>>>
KAKAKA
前領導人, 即係邊個 ?
8它已經死曬同FADE OUT
上海幫 ?團派?
唔好傻LA
中共E+只係一個利益團體
內裡派別縱橫錯綜
根本唔會有邊個掌握絕對權力
同埋, 就社會現象掀出異見
唔一定要了解佢地既DYNAMIC
(批評BUSH, 都唔一定要了解BUSH同切尼之間既關係)
DEREK, 唔再用你個BLOG開火了,
下次用番自己果個